Skip to content
indielist (beta)

A Hat in Time vs Terraria

Reviews on Steam

Terraria

28.6× more reviews

Critical reception

A Hat in Time

0.4pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Terraria

$20.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Terraria

23.1× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

A Hat in Time

6 years apart

A

A Hat in Time

2017 · Adventure

Gears for Breakfast · Gears for Breakfast

Reviews
42,589
Positive
98%
Launch price
$29.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
4.5M
Net rev
$76.6M
B

Terraria

2011 · Action

Re-Logic · Re-Logic

Reviews
1,216,769
Positive
97%
Launch price
$9.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
103.4M
Net rev
$590.2M

Tag overlap

40% shared , 8 shared tags, 12 only on A Hat in Time, 12 only on Terraria.

Only A Hat in Time

Cute3D PlatformerCollectathonGreat SoundtrackFemale ProtagonistFunnyColorfulThird PersonModdableComedyFamily FriendlyKickstarter

Shared

AdventureIndiePlatformerExplorationSingleplayerCo-opOpen WorldAction

Only Terraria

Open World Survival CraftSandboxSurvival2DMultiplayerPixel GraphicsCraftingBuildingOnline Co-OpRPGReplay ValueAtmospheric

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

2.7M to 6.3M

units (median: 4.5M)

$46.0M to $107.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

2.7Mmedian6.3M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

62.1M to 144.8M

units (median: 103.4M)

$354.1M to $826.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

62.1Mmedian144.8M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.