Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Amazing Cultivation Simulator vs Phasmophobia

Reviews on Steam

Phasmophobia

35.6× more reviews

Critical reception

Phasmophobia

9pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Phasmophobia

$5.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Phasmophobia

33.3× more units (white-box estimate)

A

Amazing Cultivation Simulator

2020

GSQ Games · GSQ Games

Reviews
19,032
Positive
86%
Launch price
$24.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
1.5M
Net rev
$21.7M
B

Phasmophobia

2020 · Action

Kinetic Games · Kinetic Games

Reviews
676,875
Positive
95%
Launch price
$19.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
50.8M
Net rev
$579.7M

Tag overlap

20% shared , 4 shared tags, 16 only on Amazing Cultivation Simulator, 16 only on Phasmophobia.

Only Amazing Cultivation Simulator

SimulationMartial ArtsRPGSandboxStrategyMythologyColony SimSurvivalBase-BuildingOpen WorldManagementFantasyBuilding2DAnimeNudity

Shared

IndieSingleplayerEarly AccessPsychological Horror

Only Phasmophobia

HorrorOnline Co-OpMultiplayerCo-opSupernaturalVRFirst-PersonInvestigationDarkDemonsDetectiveMysteryThriller3DActionTactical

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

914K to 2.1M

units (median: 1.5M)

$13.0M to $30.4M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

914Kmedian2.1M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

30.5M to 71.1M

units (median: 50.8M)

$347.8M to $811.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

30.5Mmedian71.1M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.