Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Amazing Frog? vs Rust

Reviews on Steam

Rust

98.8× more reviews

Critical reception

Amazing Frog?

7.3pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Amazing Frog?

$20.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

98.8× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Rust

4 years apart

A

Amazing Frog?

2014 · Action

Fayju · Fayju

Reviews
11,545
Positive
94%
Launch price
$19.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
1.0M
Net rev
$11.9M
B

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M

Tag overlap

30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Amazing Frog?, 14 only on Rust.

Only Amazing Frog?

4 Player LocalSplit ScreenPhysicsAction-AdventureControllerCharacter CustomizationSingleplayerLocal Co-OpFunnyExplorationPartyParkourDrivingChoose Your Own Adventure

Shared

Early AccessOpen WorldSandboxIndieAdventureAction

Only Rust

SurvivalCraftingMultiplayerOpen World Survival CraftBuildingPvPFirst-PersonNudityFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpPost-apocalypticSimulation

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

623K to 1.5M

units (median: 1.0M)

$7.1M to $16.6M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

623Kmedian1.5M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

$1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.