Amazing Frog? vs Wallpaper Engine
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
79.2× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
3.8pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$15.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
35.2× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Wallpaper Engine
4 years apart
Amazing Frog?
2014 · Action
- Reviews
- 11,545
- Positive
- 94%
- Launch price
- $19.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 1.0M
- Net rev
- $11.9M
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Tag overlap
30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Amazing Frog?, 14 only on Wallpaper Engine.
Only Amazing Frog?
4 Player LocalOpen WorldSplit ScreenPhysicsAction-AdventureControllerCharacter CustomizationLocal Co-OpAdventureExplorationPartyParkourDrivingChoose Your Own Adventure
Shared
Early AccessSandboxIndieSingleplayerFunnyAction
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingFirst-PersonNSFWMemesCutePhoto EditingHorrorGamingGame Development
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.0623K to 1.5M
units (median: 1.0M)
≈ $7.1M to $16.6M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.