BattleBlock Theater® vs Wallpaper Engine
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
16.5× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
0.8pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$10.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
7.3× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Wallpaper Engine
4 years apart
BattleBlock Theater®
2014 · Action
- Reviews
- 55,545
- Positive
- 97%
- Launch price
- $14.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 5.0M
- Net rev
- $42.8M
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Tag overlap
20% shared , 4 shared tags, 16 only on BattleBlock Theater®, 16 only on Wallpaper Engine.
Only BattleBlock Theater®
Co-opPlatformerComedyLevel EditorMultiplayerLocal Co-Op2DOnline Co-OpCats2D PlatformerSide ScrollerLocal MultiplayerCasualPuzzle-PlatformerPuzzleNarration
Shared
FunnyActionSingleplayerIndie
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingFirst-PersonNSFWMemesCuteEarly AccessPhoto EditingSandboxHorrorGamingGame Development
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.03.0M to 7.0M
units (median: 5.0M)
≈ $25.7M to $59.9M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.