Skip to content
indielist (beta)

嗜血印 Bloody Spell vs Rust

Reviews on Steam

Rust

34.0× more reviews

Critical reception

嗜血印 Bloody Spell

2.5pp gap

Cheaper at launch

嗜血印 Bloody Spell

$15.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

47.1× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

嗜血印 Bloody Spell

4 years apart

A

嗜血印 Bloody Spell

2022 · Action

艺龙游戏 · 艺龙游戏

Reviews
33,520
Positive
89%
Launch price
$24.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
2.2M
Net rev
$31.1M
B

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M

Tag overlap

35% shared , 7 shared tags, 13 only on 嗜血印 Bloody Spell, 13 only on Rust.

Only 嗜血印 Bloody Spell

Sexual ContentFemale ProtagonistAction RPGHack and SlashMartial Arts3DRogue-likeSingleplayerViolentRogue-liteRPG3D VisionGore

Shared

NudityActionOpen WorldMultiplayerOnline Co-OpAdventureIndie

Only Rust

SurvivalCraftingOpen World Survival CraftBuildingPvPSandboxFirst-PersonFPSShooterCo-opPost-apocalypticEarly AccessSimulation

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

1.3M to 3.1M

units (median: 2.2M)

$18.7M to $43.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

1.3Mmedian3.1M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

$1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.