Class of '09 vs Wallpaper Engine
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
106.1× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
3.4pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$5.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
77.2× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Class of '09
3 years apart
Class of '09
2021 · Casual
- Reviews
- 8,623
- Positive
- 95%
- Launch price
- $9.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 474K
- Net rev
- $2.7M
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Tag overlap
15% shared , 3 shared tags, 17 only on Class of '09, 17 only on Wallpaper Engine.
Only Class of '09
CasualChoose Your Own AdventureComedyRPG2DAmericaFemale ProtagonistSatireThird PersonVisual NovelMultiple EndingsSexual ContentNonlinearStory RichDark ComedyPsychological HorrorHentai
Shared
SingleplayerAnimeIndie
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingFirst-PersonNSFWMemesCuteActionFunnyEarly AccessPhoto EditingSandboxHorrorGamingGame Development
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.0285K to 664K
units (median: 474K)
≈ $1.6M to $3.8M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.