Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Day of Dragons vs Rust

Reviews on Steam

Rust

146.8× more reviews

Critical reception

Rust

21.6pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Day of Dragons

$20.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

240.2× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Day of Dragons

1 years apart

A

Day of Dragons

2019 · Indie

Beawesome Games · Beawesome Games

Reviews
7,770
Positive
65%
Launch price
$19.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
427K
Net rev
$4.9M
B

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M

Tag overlap

40% shared , 8 shared tags, 12 only on Day of Dragons, 12 only on Rust.

Only Day of Dragons

DragonsMassively MultiplayerPvECombatFantasyRPGMMORPGRealisticExplorationThird PersonPerma DeathImmersive Sim

Shared

Early AccessSurvivalMultiplayerSandboxPvPOpen WorldFirst-PersonSimulation

Only Rust

CraftingOpen World Survival CraftBuildingAdventureActionNudityFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpIndiePost-apocalyptic

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

256K to 598K

units (median: 427K)

$2.9M to $6.8M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

256Kmedian598K

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

$1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.