Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Dicey Dungeons vs Stardew Valley

Reviews on Steam

Stardew Valley

74.6× more reviews

Critical reception

Stardew Valley

9.2pp gap

Estimated sales (median)

Stardew Valley

89.5× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Dicey Dungeons

3 years apart

A

Dicey Dungeons

2019 · Indie

Terry Cavanagh · Terry Cavanagh

Reviews
11,649
Positive
89%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
874K
Net rev
$7.5M
B

Stardew Valley

2016 · Indie

ConcernedApe · ConcernedApe

Reviews
868,743
Positive
98%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
78.2M
Net rev
$669.5M

Tag overlap

30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Dicey Dungeons, 14 only on Stardew Valley.

Only Dicey Dungeons

Roguelike DeckbuilderCard BattlerDeckbuildingRogue-liteRogue-likeStrategyTurn-BasedCard GameMouse onlyReplay ValueColorfulCartoonDungeon CrawlerProcedural Generation

Shared

IndieSingleplayerCuteGreat SoundtrackCasualRPG

Only Stardew Valley

Farming SimPixel GraphicsMultiplayerLife SimRelaxingAgricultureSimulationCraftingSandboxBuildingOpen World2DDating SimFishing

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

524K to 1.2M

units (median: 874K)

$4.5M to $10.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

524Kmedian1.2M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

46.9M to 109.5M

units (median: 78.2M)

$401.7M to $937.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

46.9Mmedian109.5M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.