Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Don't Starve Together vs Rust

Reviews on Steam

Rust

3.1× more reviews

Critical reception

Don't Starve Together

8.1pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Don't Starve Together

$25.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

3.1× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Rust

2 years apart

A

Don't Starve Together

2016 · Action

Klei Entertainment · Klei Entertainment

Reviews
367,165
Positive
95%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
33.0M
Net rev
$282.9M
B

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M

Tag overlap

55% shared , 11 shared tags, 9 only on Don't Starve Together, 9 only on Rust.

Only Don't Starve Together

Difficult2DAtmosphericFunnySurvival HorrorStrategyHorrorSingleplayerRogue-like

Shared

SurvivalOpen World Survival CraftMultiplayerCo-opOpen WorldAdventureCraftingOnline Co-OpSandboxIndieAction

Only Rust

BuildingPvPFirst-PersonNudityFPSShooterPost-apocalypticEarly AccessSimulation

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

19.8M to 46.3M

units (median: 33.0M)

$169.8M to $396.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

19.8Mmedian46.3M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

$1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.