Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Golf It! vs Phasmophobia

Reviews on Steam

Phasmophobia

27.7× more reviews

Critical reception

Phasmophobia

4.1pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Golf It!

$11.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Phasmophobia

51.9× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Golf It!

3 years apart

A

Golf It!

2023 · Casual

Perfuse Entertainment · Perfuse Entertainment

Reviews
24,433
Positive
90%
Launch price
$8.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
977K
Net rev
$5.0M
B

Phasmophobia

2020 · Action

Kinetic Games · Kinetic Games

Reviews
676,875
Positive
95%
Launch price
$19.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
50.8M
Net rev
$579.7M

Tag overlap

35% shared , 7 shared tags, 13 only on Golf It!, 13 only on Phasmophobia.

Only Golf It!

Mini GolfGolfCasualSportsFunnySimulationLevel EditorLocal MultiplayerSandboxFamily FriendlyMemesDifficultStrategy

Shared

MultiplayerOnline Co-OpSingleplayerIndieEarly AccessCo-opVR

Only Phasmophobia

HorrorPsychological HorrorSupernaturalFirst-PersonInvestigationDarkDemonsDetectiveMysteryThriller3DActionTactical

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

586K to 1.4M

units (median: 977K)

$3.0M to $7.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

586Kmedian1.4M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

30.5M to 71.1M

units (median: 50.8M)

$347.8M to $811.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

30.5Mmedian71.1M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.