Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Golf It! vs Stardew Valley

Reviews on Steam

Stardew Valley

35.6× more reviews

Critical reception

Stardew Valley

8pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Golf It!

$6.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Stardew Valley

80.0× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Golf It!

7 years apart

A

Golf It!

2023 · Casual

Perfuse Entertainment · Perfuse Entertainment

Reviews
24,433
Positive
90%
Launch price
$8.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
977K
Net rev
$5.0M
B

Stardew Valley

2016 · Indie

ConcernedApe · ConcernedApe

Reviews
868,743
Positive
98%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
78.2M
Net rev
$669.5M

Tag overlap

30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Golf It!, 14 only on Stardew Valley.

Only Golf It!

Mini GolfGolfSportsFunnyOnline Co-OpLevel EditorEarly AccessLocal MultiplayerCo-opVRFamily FriendlyMemesDifficultStrategy

Shared

MultiplayerCasualSingleplayerSimulationIndieSandbox

Only Stardew Valley

Farming SimPixel GraphicsLife SimRPGRelaxingAgricultureCraftingBuildingOpen World2DDating SimCuteGreat SoundtrackFishing

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

586K to 1.4M

units (median: 977K)

$3.0M to $7.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

586Kmedian1.4M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

46.9M to 109.5M

units (median: 78.2M)

$401.7M to $937.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

46.9Mmedian109.5M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.