Golf With Your Friends vs Rust
Reviews on Steam
Rust
23.2× more reviews
Critical reception
Golf With Your Friends
0.6pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Golf With Your Friends
$25.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Rust
34.8× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Golf With Your Friends
2 years apart
Golf With Your Friends
2020 · Casual
Blacklight Interactive · Team17
- Reviews
- 49,202
- Positive
- 88%
- Launch price
- $14.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 3.0M
- Net rev
- $25.3M
Rust
2018 · Action
Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios
- Reviews
- 1,140,437
- Positive
- 87%
- Launch price
- $39.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 102.6M
- Net rev
- $2344.5M
Tag overlap
30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Golf With Your Friends, 14 only on Rust.
Only Golf With Your Friends
CasualMini GolfSportsGolfFunnyFamily FriendlySingleplayerPhysicsStrategyGreat SoundtrackLocal MultiplayerDifficultMemesMassively Multiplayer
Shared
MultiplayerIndieCo-opEarly AccessSimulationOnline Co-Op
Only Rust
SurvivalCraftingOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftBuildingPvPSandboxAdventureFirst-PersonActionNudityFPSShooterPost-apocalyptic
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.01.8M to 4.1M
units (median: 3.0M)
≈ $15.2M to $35.4M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.061.6M to 143.7M
units (median: 102.6M)
≈ $1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.