Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Horizon Chase Turbo vs Rust

Reviews on Steam

Rust

194.0× more reviews

Critical reception

Horizon Chase Turbo

5.6pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Horizon Chase Turbo

$20.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

232.8× more units (white-box estimate)

A

Horizon Chase Turbo

2018 · Action

AQUIRIS · AQUIRIS

Reviews
5,878
Positive
93%
Launch price
$19.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
441K
Net rev
$5.0M
B

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M

Tag overlap

15% shared , 3 shared tags, 17 only on Horizon Chase Turbo, 17 only on Rust.

Only Horizon Chase Turbo

RacingArcadeCasualRetroSportsLocal MultiplayerGreat Soundtrack4 Player LocalSplit ScreenLocal Co-OpNostalgiaSingleplayerDriving1990'sColorfulOld SchoolEpic

Shared

IndieActionMultiplayer

Only Rust

SurvivalCraftingOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftBuildingPvPSandboxAdventureFirst-PersonNudityFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpPost-apocalypticEarly AccessSimulation

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

265K to 617K

units (median: 441K)

$3.0M to $7.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

265Kmedian617K

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

$1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.