Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Kerbal Space Program: Making History Expansion vs Stardew Valley

Reviews on Steam

Stardew Valley

1153.7× more reviews

Critical reception

Stardew Valley

30.6pp gap

Estimated sales (median)

Stardew Valley

1887.9× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Kerbal Space Program: Making History Expansion

2 years apart

A

Kerbal Space Program: Making History Expansion

2018 · Indie

Squad · Private Division

Reviews
753
Positive
68%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
41K
Net rev
$0.4M
B

Stardew Valley

2016 · Indie

ConcernedApe · ConcernedApe

Reviews
868,743
Positive
98%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
78.2M
Net rev
$669.5M

Tag overlap

15% shared , 3 shared tags, 2 only on Kerbal Space Program: Making History Expansion, 17 only on Stardew Valley.

Only Kerbal Space Program: Making History Expansion

SpaceSpace Sim

Shared

SimulationIndieSandbox

Only Stardew Valley

Farming SimPixel GraphicsMultiplayerLife SimRPGRelaxingAgricultureCraftingBuildingSingleplayerCasualOpen World2DDating SimCuteGreat SoundtrackFishing

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

25K to 58K

units (median: 41K)

$213K to $496K net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

25Kmedian58K

Sales estimate

vv1.0

46.9M to 109.5M

units (median: 78.2M)

$401.7M to $937.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

46.9Mmedian109.5M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.