Lorelei and the Laser Eyes vs Rust
Reviews on Steam
Rust
373.8× more reviews
Critical reception
Lorelei and the Laser Eyes
6.9pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Lorelei and the Laser Eyes
$15.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Rust
448.5× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Lorelei and the Laser Eyes
6 years apart
Lorelei and the Laser Eyes
2024 · Adventure
Simogo · Annapurna Interactive
- Reviews
- 3,051
- Positive
- 94%
- Launch price
- $24.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 229K
- Net rev
- $3.3M
Rust
2018 · Action
Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios
- Reviews
- 1,140,437
- Positive
- 87%
- Launch price
- $39.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 102.6M
- Net rev
- $2344.5M
Tag overlap
15% shared , 3 shared tags, 13 only on Lorelei and the Laser Eyes, 17 only on Rust.
Only Lorelei and the Laser Eyes
PuzzleExplorationAction-AdventureHorrorMysteryStylized3DPsychologicalDark FantasyStory RichSingleplayerFemale ProtagonistNoir
Shared
AdventureActionIndie
Only Rust
SurvivalCraftingMultiplayerOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftBuildingPvPSandboxFirst-PersonNudityFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpPost-apocalypticEarly AccessSimulation
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.0137K to 320K
units (median: 229K)
≈ $2.0M to $4.6M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.061.6M to 143.7M
units (median: 102.6M)
≈ $1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.