Lost Castle 2 vs Wallpaper Engine
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
81.9× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
18.7pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$13.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
65.5× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Lost Castle 2
6 years apart
Lost Castle 2
2024 · Action
- Reviews
- 11,179
- Positive
- 79%
- Launch price
- $17.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 559K
- Net rev
- $5.7M
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 915,147
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Tag overlap
25% shared , 5 shared tags, 15 only on Lost Castle 2, 15 only on Wallpaper Engine.
Only Lost Castle 2
MultiplayerLocal Co-OpRogue-likeOnline Co-OpRogue-liteAction RoguelikeBeat 'em upAction-AdventureAdventureCartoonRPGMagicCo-opCombat2D
Shared
Early AccessSingleplayerActionFunnyIndie
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingFirst-PersonNSFWMemesCutePhoto EditingSandboxHorrorGamingGame Development
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.0335K to 783K
units (median: 559K)
≈ $3.4M to $8.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.