Metal Bringer vs Wallpaper Engine
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
803.2× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
9.4pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$15.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
642.6× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Metal Bringer
7 years apart
Metal Bringer
2025 · Action
- Reviews
- 1,139
- Positive
- 89%
- Launch price
- $19.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 57K
- Net rev
- $0.7M
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Tag overlap
15% shared , 3 shared tags, 17 only on Metal Bringer, 17 only on Wallpaper Engine.
Only Metal Bringer
Action RoguelikeMechsHack and SlashSpectacle fighterDungeon CrawlerRogue-liteCharacter CustomizationAction RPG2.5DIsometricVoxelStory RichSci-fiRobotsReplay ValueCollectathonColorful
Shared
ActionIndieSingleplayer
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingFirst-PersonNSFWMemesCuteFunnyEarly AccessPhoto EditingSandboxHorrorGamingGame Development
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.034K to 80K
units (median: 57K)
≈ $390K to $910K net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.