No Man's Sky vs Wallpaper Engine
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
3.0× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
13.1pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$55.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
1.3× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Wallpaper Engine
2 years apart
No Man's Sky
2016 · Action
- Reviews
- 307,436
- Positive
- 85%
- Launch price
- $59.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 29.2M
- Net rev
- $1000.8M
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Tag overlap
25% shared , 5 shared tags, 15 only on No Man's Sky, 15 only on Wallpaper Engine.
Only No Man's Sky
Open WorldOpen World Survival CraftSpaceExplorationSci-fiSurvivalProcedural GenerationAdventureMultiplayerAtmosphericCraftingSpace SimSimulationFPSVR
Shared
First-PersonSandboxSingleplayerIndieAction
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingNSFWMemesCuteFunnyEarly AccessPhoto EditingHorrorGamingGame Development
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.017.5M to 40.9M
units (median: 29.2M)
≈ $600.5M to $1401.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.