Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen vs Stardew Valley
Reviews on Steam
Stardew Valley
172.6× more reviews
Critical reception
Stardew Valley
24.8pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Stardew Valley
$25.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Stardew Valley
207.1× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen
8 years apart
Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen
2024 · Adventure
Visionary Realms · Visionary Realms
- Reviews
- 5,034
- Positive
- 74%
- Launch price
- $39.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 378K
- Net rev
- $8.6M
Stardew Valley
2016 · Indie
- Reviews
- 868,743
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $14.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 78.2M
- Net rev
- $669.5M
Tag overlap
20% shared , 4 shared tags, 12 only on Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen, 16 only on Stardew Valley.
Only Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen
AdventureMMORPGAction-AdventureMassively Multiplayer3DFantasyEarly AccessStylizedCharacter CustomizationStory RichOnline Co-OpPvE
Shared
RPGOpen WorldMultiplayerIndie
Only Stardew Valley
Farming SimPixel GraphicsLife SimRelaxingAgricultureSimulationCraftingSandboxBuildingSingleplayerCasual2DDating SimCuteGreat SoundtrackFishing
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.0227K to 529K
units (median: 378K)
≈ $5.2M to $12.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.046.9M to 109.5M
units (median: 78.2M)
≈ $401.7M to $937.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.