Phasmophobia vs Planetary Annihilation: TITANS
Reviews on Steam
Phasmophobia
46.6× more reviews
Critical reception
Phasmophobia
10.2pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Phasmophobia
$10.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Phasmophobia
41.1× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Phasmophobia
5 years apart
Phasmophobia
2020 · Action
- Reviews
- 676,875
- Positive
- 95%
- Launch price
- $19.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 50.8M
- Net rev
- $579.7M
Planetary Annihilation: TITANS
2015 · Action
Planetary Annihilation Inc · Planetary Annihilation Inc
- Reviews
- 14,528
- Positive
- 84%
- Launch price
- $29.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 1.2M
- Net rev
- $21.2M
Tag overlap
25% shared , 5 shared tags, 15 only on Phasmophobia, 15 only on Planetary Annihilation: TITANS.
Only Phasmophobia
HorrorPsychological HorrorSupernaturalVRFirst-PersonInvestigationDarkDemonsDetectiveMysteryThriller3DEarly AccessActionTactical
Shared
Online Co-OpMultiplayerCo-opIndieSingleplayer
Only Planetary Annihilation: TITANS
RTSStrategyReal Time TacticsBase-BuildingSci-fiBuildingWarPvPRobotsSpaceGrand StrategyDestructionMechsFuturisticSimulation
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.030.5M to 71.1M
units (median: 50.8M)
≈ $347.8M to $811.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.0741K to 1.7M
units (median: 1.2M)
≈ $12.7M to $29.6M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.