Phasmophobia vs Shovel Knight: Treasure Trove
Reviews on Steam
Phasmophobia
40.5× more reviews
Critical reception
Shovel Knight: Treasure Trove
1pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Phasmophobia
$20.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Phasmophobia
28.9× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Phasmophobia
6 years apart
Phasmophobia
2020 · Action
- Reviews
- 676,875
- Positive
- 95%
- Launch price
- $19.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 50.8M
- Net rev
- $579.7M
Shovel Knight: Treasure Trove
2014 · Action
Yacht Club Games · Yacht Club Games
- Reviews
- 16,719
- Positive
- 96%
- Launch price
- $39.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 1.8M
- Net rev
- $40.1M
Tag overlap
15% shared , 3 shared tags, 17 only on Phasmophobia, 17 only on Shovel Knight: Treasure Trove.
Only Phasmophobia
HorrorOnline Co-OpMultiplayerPsychological HorrorCo-opSupernaturalVRFirst-PersonInvestigationDarkDemonsDetectiveMysteryThriller3DEarly AccessTactical
Shared
IndieActionSingleplayer
Only Shovel Knight: Treasure Trove
PlatformerPixel GraphicsRetroGreat Soundtrack2DAdventureDifficultSide ScrollerKickstarterFantasyOld SchoolMedievalFunnyArcadeComedyRPGLocal Co-Op
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.030.5M to 71.1M
units (median: 50.8M)
≈ $347.8M to $811.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.01.1M to 2.5M
units (median: 1.8M)
≈ $24.1M to $56.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.