Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Phasmophobia vs Starbound

Reviews on Steam

Phasmophobia

5.6× more reviews

Critical reception

Phasmophobia

4.4pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Starbound

$5.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Phasmophobia

4.7× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Phasmophobia

4 years apart

A

Phasmophobia

2020 · Action

Kinetic Games · Kinetic Games

Reviews
676,875
Positive
95%
Launch price
$19.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
50.8M
Net rev
$579.7M
B

Starbound

2016 · Action

Chucklefish · Chucklefish

Reviews
120,582
Positive
90%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
10.9M
Net rev
$92.9M

Tag overlap

25% shared , 5 shared tags, 15 only on Phasmophobia, 15 only on Starbound.

Only Phasmophobia

HorrorPsychological HorrorSupernaturalVRFirst-PersonInvestigationDarkDemonsDetectiveMysteryThriller3DEarly AccessTacticalSingleplayer

Shared

Online Co-OpMultiplayerCo-opIndieAction

Only Starbound

Open World Survival CraftSandboxSurvivalSpaceAdventureCraftingPixel GraphicsOpen WorldExplorationRelaxing2DBuildingRPGAtmosphericSci-fi

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

30.5M to 71.1M

units (median: 50.8M)

$347.8M to $811.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

30.5Mmedian71.1M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

6.5M to 15.2M

units (median: 10.9M)

$55.8M to $130.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

6.5Mmedian15.2M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.