Phasmophobia vs The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
Reviews on Steam
Phasmophobia
1.9× more reviews
Critical reception
The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
2.6pp gap
Cheaper at launch
The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
$5.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Phasmophobia
1.6× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Phasmophobia
6 years apart
Phasmophobia
2020 · Action
- Reviews
- 676,875
- Positive
- 95%
- Launch price
- $19.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 50.8M
- Net rev
- $579.7M
The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
2014 · Action
- Reviews
- 357,988
- Positive
- 97%
- Launch price
- $14.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 32.2M
- Net rev
- $275.9M
Tag overlap
30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Phasmophobia, 14 only on The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth.
Only Phasmophobia
Online Co-OpMultiplayerPsychological HorrorSupernaturalVRFirst-PersonInvestigationDemonsDetectiveMysteryThriller3DEarly AccessTactical
Shared
HorrorCo-opDarkIndieActionSingleplayer
Only The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
Action RoguelikeRogue-likeReplay ValueDifficultPixel GraphicsDungeon CrawlerGreat Soundtrack2DLocal Co-OpRemakeGoreProcedural GenerationRogue-liteAtmospheric
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.030.5M to 71.1M
units (median: 50.8M)
≈ $347.8M to $811.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.019.3M to 45.1M
units (median: 32.2M)
≈ $165.5M to $386.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.