Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Phasmophobia vs The Past Within

Reviews on Steam

Phasmophobia

41.0× more reviews

Critical reception

The Past Within

0.2pp gap

Cheaper at launch

The Past Within

$14.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Phasmophobia

47.3× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

The Past Within

2 years apart

A

Phasmophobia

2020 · Action

Kinetic Games · Kinetic Games

Reviews
676,875
Positive
95%
Launch price
$19.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
50.8M
Net rev
$579.7M
B

The Past Within

2022 · Adventure

Rusty Lake · Rusty Lake

Reviews
16,511
Positive
95%
Launch price
$5.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
1.1M
Net rev
$3.7M

Tag overlap

45% shared , 9 shared tags, 11 only on Phasmophobia, 11 only on The Past Within.

Only Phasmophobia

SupernaturalVRFirst-PersonInvestigationDarkDemonsDetectiveEarly AccessActionTacticalSingleplayer

Shared

HorrorOnline Co-OpMultiplayerPsychological HorrorCo-opMysteryThriller3DIndie

Only The Past Within

PuzzleEscape RoomPoint & ClickAdventureLocal Co-OpStory RichAtmosphericLocal MultiplayerAsynchronous Multiplayer2DSurreal

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

30.5M to 71.1M

units (median: 50.8M)

$347.8M to $811.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

30.5Mmedian71.1M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

644K to 1.5M

units (median: 1.1M)

$2.2M to $5.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

644Kmedian1.5M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.