Planetary Annihilation: TITANS vs Stardew Valley
Reviews on Steam
Stardew Valley
59.8× more reviews
Critical reception
Stardew Valley
14.1pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Stardew Valley
$15.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Stardew Valley
63.3× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Stardew Valley
1 years apart
Planetary Annihilation: TITANS
2015 · Action
Planetary Annihilation Inc · Planetary Annihilation Inc
- Reviews
- 14,528
- Positive
- 84%
- Launch price
- $29.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 1.2M
- Net rev
- $21.2M
Stardew Valley
2016 · Indie
- Reviews
- 868,743
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $14.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 78.2M
- Net rev
- $669.5M
Tag overlap
25% shared , 5 shared tags, 15 only on Planetary Annihilation: TITANS, 15 only on Stardew Valley.
Only Planetary Annihilation: TITANS
RTSStrategyReal Time TacticsBase-BuildingSci-fiWarOnline Co-OpCo-opPvPRobotsSpaceGrand StrategyDestructionMechsFuturistic
Shared
MultiplayerSingleplayerBuildingIndieSimulation
Only Stardew Valley
Farming SimPixel GraphicsLife SimRPGRelaxingAgricultureCraftingSandboxCasualOpen World2DDating SimCuteGreat SoundtrackFishing
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.0741K to 1.7M
units (median: 1.2M)
≈ $12.7M to $29.6M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.046.9M to 109.5M
units (median: 78.2M)
≈ $401.7M to $937.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.