Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Raging Loop vs Rust

Reviews on Steam

Rust

112.7× more reviews

Critical reception

Raging Loop

8.7pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Raging Loop

$10.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

96.6× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Rust

1 years apart

A

Raging Loop

2017 · Adventure

KEMCO · KEMCO

Reviews
10,122
Positive
96%
Launch price
$29.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
1.1M
Net rev
$18.2M
B

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M

Tag overlap

10% shared , 2 shared tags, 16 only on Raging Loop, 18 only on Rust.

Only Raging Loop

Visual NovelMysteryPsychological HorrorStory RichPsychologicalAtmosphericGoreSingleplayerDetectiveViolentAnimeHorrorSexual ContentMultiple EndingsTime TravelDating Sim

Shared

AdventureIndie

Only Rust

SurvivalCraftingMultiplayerOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftBuildingPvPSandboxFirst-PersonActionNudityFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpPost-apocalypticEarly AccessSimulation

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

638K to 1.5M

units (median: 1.1M)

$10.9M to $25.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

638Kmedian1.5M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

$1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.