Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Roots of Pacha vs Rust

Reviews on Steam

Rust

256.2× more reviews

Critical reception

Roots of Pacha

6.8pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Roots of Pacha

$15.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

354.7× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Roots of Pacha

5 years apart

A

Roots of Pacha

2023 · Indie

Soda Den · Soda Den

Reviews
4,452
Positive
94%
Launch price
$24.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
289K
Net rev
$4.1M
B

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M

Tag overlap

30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Roots of Pacha, 14 only on Rust.

Only Roots of Pacha

Farming SimPixel GraphicsRelaxingLife SimDating SimRPGCasualRomanceExplorationImmersive SimAgricultureCozyCuteController

Shared

IndieOnline Co-OpCraftingBuildingSandboxSimulation

Only Rust

SurvivalMultiplayerOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftPvPAdventureFirst-PersonActionNudityFPSShooterCo-opPost-apocalypticEarly Access

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

174K to 405K

units (median: 289K)

$2.5M to $5.8M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

174Kmedian405K

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

$1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.