Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Rust vs Sally Face - Season Pass

Reviews on Steam

Rust

938.6× more reviews

Critical reception

Sally Face - Season Pass

8.6pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Sally Face - Season Pass

$28.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

844.8× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Rust

2 years apart

A

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M
B

Sally Face - Season Pass

2016 · Adventure

Portable Moose · Portable Moose

Reviews
1,215
Positive
96%
Launch price
$11.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
122K
Net rev
$0.8M

Tag overlap

10% shared , 2 shared tags, 18 only on Rust, 7 only on Sally Face - Season Pass.

Only Rust

SurvivalCraftingMultiplayerOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftBuildingPvPSandboxFirst-PersonActionNudityFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpPost-apocalypticEarly AccessSimulation

Shared

AdventureIndie

Only Sally Face - Season Pass

Story RichHorrorPuzzlePsychological HorrorAtmosphericGreat SoundtrackSingleplayer

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

≈ $1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

73K to 170K

units (median: 122K)

≈ $499K to $1.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

73Kmedian170K

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.