Rust vs Thank Goodness You're Here!
Reviews on Steam
Rust
142.4× more reviews
Critical reception
Thank Goodness You're Here!
9.3pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Thank Goodness You're Here!
$20.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Rust
183.1× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Thank Goodness You're Here!
6 years apart
Rust
2018 · Action
Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios
- Reviews
- 1,140,437
- Positive
- 87%
- Launch price
- $39.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 102.6M
- Net rev
- $2344.5M
Thank Goodness You're Here!
2024 · Adventure
- Reviews
- 8,007
- Positive
- 96%
- Launch price
- $19.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 560K
- Net rev
- $6.4M
Tag overlap
15% shared , 3 shared tags, 17 only on Rust, 17 only on Thank Goodness You're Here!.
Only Rust
SurvivalCraftingMultiplayerOpen World Survival CraftBuildingPvPSandboxFirst-PersonActionNudityFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpPost-apocalypticEarly AccessSimulation
Shared
Open WorldAdventureIndie
Only Thank Goodness You're Here!
ComedyFunnyHand-drawnExplorationCasual2D PlatformerPlatformer2DShortSide ScrollerCartoonSingleplayerColorfulCartoonyPuzzleCinematicPuzzle-Platformer
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.061.6M to 143.7M
units (median: 102.6M)
≈ $1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.0336K to 785K
units (median: 560K)
≈ $3.8M to $9.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.