Rust vs The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
Reviews on Steam
Rust
60.1× more reviews
Critical reception
Rust
20.9pp gap
Cheaper at launch
The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
$25.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Rust
135.3× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
5 years apart
Rust
2018 · Action
Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios
- Reviews
- 1,140,888
- Positive
- 87%
- Launch price
- $39.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 102.7M
- Net rev
- $2345.4M
The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
2023 · Action
Sumo Digital · Gun Interactive
- Reviews
- 18,972
- Positive
- 66%
- Launch price
- $14.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 759K
- Net rev
- $6.5M
Tag overlap
30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Rust, 14 only on The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.
Only Rust
CraftingOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftBuildingSandboxAdventureFirst-PersonFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpPost-apocalypticEarly AccessSimulation
Shared
SurvivalMultiplayerPvPActionNudityIndie
Only The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
HorrorSurvival HorrorGoreTeam-BasedThird PersonStealthViolentAsynchronous MultiplayerBloodCinematic3DAtmosphericPsychological HorrorStrategy
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.061.6M to 143.8M
units (median: 102.7M)
≈ $1407.3M to $3283.6M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.0455K to 1.1M
units (median: 759K)
≈ $3.9M to $9.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.