Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Rust vs Two Point Campus

Reviews on Steam

Rust

143.9× more reviews

Critical reception

Two Point Campus

0.8pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Two Point Campus

$10.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Rust

259.0× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Two Point Campus

4 years apart

A

Rust

2018 · Action

Facepunch Studios · Facepunch Studios

Reviews
1,140,437
Positive
87%
Launch price
$39.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
102.6M
Net rev
$2344.5M
B

Two Point Campus

2022 · Casual

Two Point Studios · SEGA

Reviews
7,927
Positive
88%
Launch price
$29.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
396K
Net rev
$6.8M

Tag overlap

20% shared , 4 shared tags, 16 only on Rust, 16 only on Two Point Campus.

Only Rust

SurvivalCraftingMultiplayerOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftPvPAdventureFirst-PersonActionNudityFPSShooterCo-opOnline Co-OpPost-apocalypticEarly Access

Shared

BuildingSandboxIndieSimulation

Only Two Point Campus

ManagementStrategyCity BuilderCasualFunnyCartoonyIsometricComedySingleplayerFamily FriendlyEconomyTacticalReplay ValueEducationCuteRetro

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

61.6M to 143.7M

units (median: 102.6M)

$1406.7M to $3282.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

61.6Mmedian143.7M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

238K to 555K

units (median: 396K)

$4.1M to $9.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

238Kmedian555K

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.