Schedule I vs Wallpaper Engine
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
3.3× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
0.2pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$15.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
2.7× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Schedule I
7 years apart
Schedule I
2025 · Action
- Reviews
- 275,336
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $19.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 13.8M
- Net rev
- $157.2M
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Tag overlap
15% shared , 3 shared tags, 17 only on Schedule I, 17 only on Wallpaper Engine.
Only Schedule I
SimulationCo-opCrimeMultiplayerOpen WorldManagementCraftingBase-BuildingAutomationBuildingStealthStrategyFPSCharacter CustomizationDrivingShooterAction-Adventure
Shared
First-PersonActionEarly Access
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingNSFWIndieMemesCuteSingleplayerFunnyPhoto EditingSandboxHorrorGamingGame Development
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.08.3M to 19.3M
units (median: 13.8M)
≈ $94.3M to $220.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.