Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Slime Rancher vs Stardew Valley

Reviews on Steam

Stardew Valley

6.4× more reviews

Critical reception

Stardew Valley

0.5pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Stardew Valley

$5.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Stardew Valley

6.4× more units (white-box estimate)

More recent

Slime Rancher

1 years apart

A

Slime Rancher

2017 · Action

Monomi Park · Monomi Park

Reviews
136,310
Positive
98%
Launch price
$19.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
12.3M
Net rev
$140.1M
B

Stardew Valley

2016 · Indie

ConcernedApe · ConcernedApe

Reviews
868,743
Positive
98%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
78.2M
Net rev
$669.5M

Tag overlap

40% shared , 8 shared tags, 12 only on Slime Rancher, 12 only on Stardew Valley.

Only Slime Rancher

ExplorationAdventureFirst-PersonColorfulFunnyManagementFantasyFamily FriendlyFemale ProtagonistActionEarly AccessFPS

Shared

CuteSingleplayerOpen WorldSandboxCasualSimulationIndieGreat Soundtrack

Only Stardew Valley

Farming SimPixel GraphicsMultiplayerLife SimRPGRelaxingAgricultureCraftingBuilding2DDating SimFishing

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

7.4M to 17.2M

units (median: 12.3M)

$84.0M to $196.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

7.4Mmedian17.2M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

46.9M to 109.5M

units (median: 78.2M)

$401.7M to $937.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

46.9Mmedian109.5M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.