Stardew Valley vs The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
Reviews on Steam
Stardew Valley
45.8× more reviews
Critical reception
Stardew Valley
32.5pp gap
Estimated sales (median)
Stardew Valley
103.0× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
7 years apart
Stardew Valley
2016 · Indie
- Reviews
- 868,743
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $14.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 78.2M
- Net rev
- $669.5M
The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
2023 · Action
Sumo Digital · Gun Interactive
- Reviews
- 18,971
- Positive
- 66%
- Launch price
- $14.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 759K
- Net rev
- $6.5M
Tag overlap
10% shared , 2 shared tags, 18 only on Stardew Valley, 18 only on The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.
Only Stardew Valley
Farming SimPixel GraphicsLife SimRPGRelaxingAgricultureSimulationCraftingSandboxBuildingSingleplayerCasualOpen World2DDating SimCuteGreat SoundtrackFishing
Shared
MultiplayerIndie
Only The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
HorrorSurvival HorrorGoreTeam-BasedPvPThird PersonSurvivalActionStealthViolentAsynchronous MultiplayerBloodCinematic3DAtmosphericPsychological HorrorNudityStrategy
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.046.9M to 109.5M
units (median: 78.2M)
≈ $401.7M to $937.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.0455K to 1.1M
units (median: 759K)
≈ $3.9M to $9.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.