Voidtrain vs Wallpaper Engine
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
96.4× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
24.3pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$25.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
85.7× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Voidtrain
7 years apart
Voidtrain
2025 · Action
HypeTrain Digital · HypeTrain Digital
- Reviews
- 9,490
- Positive
- 74%
- Launch price
- $29.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 427K
- Net rev
- $7.3M
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Tag overlap
30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Voidtrain, 14 only on Wallpaper Engine.
Only Voidtrain
Open World Survival CraftCo-opSurvivalMultiplayerBase-BuildingCraftingOpen WorldOnline Co-OpAdventureExplorationBuildingAtmosphericSimulationTrains
Shared
First-PersonSingleplayerSandboxActionEarly AccessIndie
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingNSFWMemesCuteFunnyPhoto EditingHorrorGamingGame Development
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.0256K to 598K
units (median: 427K)
≈ $4.4M to $10.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.