Wallpaper Engine vs Windblown
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
91.1× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
9pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$20.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
56.0× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Windblown
6 years apart
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
Windblown
2024 · Action
- Reviews
- 10,048
- Positive
- 89%
- Launch price
- $24.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 653K
- Net rev
- $9.3M
Tag overlap
15% shared , 3 shared tags, 17 only on Wallpaper Engine, 17 only on Windblown.
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingFirst-PersonNSFWMemesCuteSingleplayerFunnyPhoto EditingSandboxHorrorGamingGame Development
Shared
IndieActionEarly Access
Only Windblown
Action RoguelikeHack and SlashRogue-likeSouls-likeIsometricMultiplayerRogue-liteDifficultFast-PacedReplay ValueRoguevaniaTop-DownPerma DeathCo-opDungeon CrawlerTeam-BasedCharacter Customization
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.0392K to 914K
units (median: 653K)
≈ $5.6M to $13.1M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.