Wallpaper Engine vs WitchSpring R
Reviews on Steam
Wallpaper Engine
115.0× more reviews
Critical reception
Wallpaper Engine
2.1pp gap
Cheaper at launch
Wallpaper Engine
$30.00 cheaper
Estimated sales (median)
Wallpaper Engine
54.1× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
WitchSpring R
5 years apart
Wallpaper Engine
2018 · Casual
Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team
- Reviews
- 914,881
- Positive
- 98%
- Launch price
- $4.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 36.6M
- Net rev
- $104.3M
WitchSpring R
2023 · Adventure
- Reviews
- 7,958
- Positive
- 96%
- Launch price
- $34.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 676K
- Net rev
- $13.5M
Tag overlap
25% shared , 5 shared tags, 15 only on Wallpaper Engine, 15 only on WitchSpring R.
Only Wallpaper Engine
MatureUtilitiesSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingFirst-PersonNSFWMemesActionEarly AccessPhoto EditingSandboxHorrorGamingGame Development
Shared
AnimeIndieCuteSingleplayerFunny
Only WitchSpring R
RPGFemale ProtagonistJRPGTurn-Based CombatStory RichCraftingExplorationMagicChoose Your Own AdventureTurn-Based3DFantasyCharacter CustomizationTurn-Based StrategyAdventure
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.022.0M to 51.2M
units (median: 36.6M)
≈ $62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.0406K to 947K
units (median: 676K)
≈ $8.1M to $18.9M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.