Skip to content
indielist (beta)

Call to Arms vs Wallpaper Engine

Reviews on Steam

Wallpaper Engine

53.0× more reviews

Critical reception

Wallpaper Engine

18.7pp gap

Cheaper at launch

Wallpaper Engine

$10.00 cheaper

Estimated sales (median)

Wallpaper Engine

32.6× more units (white-box estimate)

A

Call to Arms

2018 · Action

Digitalmindsoft · Digitalmindsoft

Reviews
17,272
Positive
79%
Launch price
$14.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
1.1M
Net rev
$9.6M
B

Wallpaper Engine

2018 · Casual

Wallpaper Engine Team · Wallpaper Engine Team

Reviews
914,881
Positive
98%
Launch price
$4.99
Engine
n/a
Sales (median)
36.6M
Net rev
$104.3M

Tag overlap

30% shared , 6 shared tags, 14 only on Call to Arms, 14 only on Wallpaper Engine.

Only Call to Arms

StrategyMilitaryRTSMultiplayerWarShooterTacticalSimulationReal-TimeFPSModernRealisticCo-opThird Person

Shared

ActionFirst-PersonSingleplayerSandboxIndieEarly Access

Only Wallpaper Engine

MatureUtilitiesAnimeSoftwareDesign & IllustrationAnimation & ModelingNSFWMemesCuteFunnyPhoto EditingHorrorGamingGame Development

Sales estimates

Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.

Sales estimate

vv1.0

674K to 1.6M

units (median: 1.1M)

$5.8M to $13.5M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

674Kmedian1.6M

Sales estimate

vv1.0

22.0M to 51.2M

units (median: 36.6M)

$62.6M to $146.0M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)

22.0Mmedian51.2M

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.