Crush Crush vs Euro Truck Simulator 2
Reviews on Steam
Euro Truck Simulator 2
27.3× more reviews
Critical reception
Euro Truck Simulator 2
8.6pp gap
Estimated sales (median)
Euro Truck Simulator 2
32.7× more units (white-box estimate)
More recent
Crush Crush
4 years apart
Crush Crush
2016 · Casual
Sad Panda Studios · Sad Panda Studios
- Reviews
- 28,079
- Positive
- 89%
- Launch price
- n/a
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 2.1M
- Net rev
- $18.0M
Euro Truck Simulator 2
2012 · Indie
- Reviews
- 766,107
- Positive
- 97%
- Launch price
- $19.99
- Engine
- n/a
- Sales (median)
- 68.9M
- Net rev
- $787.3M
Tag overlap
10% shared , 2 shared tags, 18 only on Crush Crush, 18 only on Euro Truck Simulator 2.
Only Crush Crush
Sexual ContentNudityFree to PlayHentaiDating SimAnimeMatureClickerCuteSingleplayerNSFWRomanceVisual NovelFunnyComedyFemale ProtagonistMemesResource Management
Shared
CasualIndie
Only Euro Truck Simulator 2
DrivingTransportationSimulationOpen WorldAutomobile SimRealisticModdableRelaxingExplorationEconomyImmersive SimManagementAtmosphericMultiplayerControllerFamily FriendlyThird PersonAdventure
Sales estimates
Both estimates use the same vv1.0 multi-factor Boxleiter method. Click "How is this calculated?" on either to see the per-factor breakdown.
Sales estimate
vv1.01.3M to 2.9M
units (median: 2.1M)
≈ $10.8M to $25.3M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
Sales estimate
vv1.041.4M to 96.5M
units (median: 68.9M)
≈ $472.4M to $1102.2M net revenue (Steam cut + refunds + regional discount applied)
How comparison pages work
Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.
Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games,
find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>.
Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.