Raft vs Scrap Mechanic: sales & reviews compared

A

R

Raft

2022 · Adventure

Redbeet Interactive · Axolot Games

Reviews: 321,118
Positive: 93%
Launch price: $19.99
Engine: Unknown
Sales (median): 22.5M
Net rev: $256.7M

B

S

Scrap Mechanic

2016 · Action

Axolot Games · Axolot Games

Reviews: 105,678
Positive: 92%
Launch price: $19.99
Engine: Unknown
Sales (median): 9.5M
Net rev: $108.6M

Tag overlap

80% shared , 16 shared tags, 4 only on Raft, 4 only on Scrap Mechanic.

Only Raft

Open World Survival Craft Underwater StrategyMassively Multiplayer

Shared

SurvivalMultiplayerCo-opCrafting Open World Building Base-BuildingOnline Co-OpAdventure Sandbox First-PersonSingleplayerSimulationEarly AccessActionIndie

Only Scrap Mechanic

Physics Third Person Funny Moddable

Sales estimates

Paid-game estimates use the same transparent multi-factor Boxleiter method. Free-to-play games never receive paid unit or revenue estimates.

Sales estimate

v1.0

13.5M to 31.5M

units (median: 22.5M)

≈ $154.0M to $359.3M modeled net revenue (fixed store-cut, refund, and regional-price assumptions applied)

13.5M median 31.5M

+ How is this calculated?

321,118 reviews × NB(70) = 22,478,260 median units

Factor	Adjustment
base	+50
year_2022	0
price_$20	0
positive_93%	+10
genre_Adventure	+10
final NB	70

Heuristic display range: median × [0.6, 1.4]. Boundary protection: NB ∈ [15, 150].

Methodology & limitations

Sales estimates use an additive Boxleiter-derived heuristic against public Steam review counts. They are not authoritative sales data, and the fixed display range is not a statistically validated confidence interval. Actual results may fall outside it, especially for deeply discounted or bundle-heavy titles. Algorithm version v1.0. Read the exact method and validation status.

Sales estimate

v1.0

5.7M to 13.3M

units (median: 9.5M)

≈ $65.2M to $152.0M modeled net revenue (fixed store-cut, refund, and regional-price assumptions applied)

5.7M median 13.3M

+ How is this calculated?

105,678 reviews × NB(90) = 9,511,020 median units

Factor	Adjustment
base	+50
year_2016	+30
price_$20	0
positive_92%	+10
final NB	90

Heuristic display range: median × [0.6, 1.4]. Boundary protection: NB ∈ [15, 150].

Methodology & limitations

Sales estimates use an additive Boxleiter-derived heuristic against public Steam review counts. They are not authoritative sales data, and the fixed display range is not a statistically validated confidence interval. Actual results may fall outside it, especially for deeply discounted or bundle-heavy titles. Algorithm version v1.0. Read the exact method and validation status.

How comparison pages work

Verdicts are objective, they call out which game scores higher on a single measurable axis (reviews, price, sales estimate, recency). They don't claim "better." Tag overlap is computed from the public Steam tag list. Sales estimates use a multi-factor Boxleiter method whose formula is shown in full on each game's page.

Want a comparison that doesn't exist? Browse all games, find two slugs, and concatenate them: /compare/games/<slug-a>/<slug-b>. Both orderings render the same content; we canonicalise to alphabetical for SEO.